🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations worked, and shared fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to restart talks with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Path

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging course since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations exercised their authority to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions restart.

The US president recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi stated the 12-day war showed the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the European states that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the ultimate solution to settle disagreements, but its criteria, regulations and principles must be followed."

"In case they address to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will get a response in the same tone."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more united, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."